as spirits of a manmade object are bound to us on some level, they
seem most interested in staying out of the dealings of mankind. There
are numerous stories of people who spy upon elf women and force them
to become their brides. Inevitably the women are unhappy and
eventually escape, leaving their husbands emotionally devastated.
There are also numerous stories of spirits who haunt the woods and who
will drag wayward travelers into rivers to drown or to some other
untimely death. When people do have dealings with the elves these
beings seem to operate on an entirely different set of expectations
than we do. Most of us would be gratified by the gift of a bonus
from our employer, yet time and time again in folklore this is the
easiest way to anger a house spirit. We know that elves were honored
with blots, but its just as possible that these ceremonies were made
in propitiation to them rather than in kinship as are our blots made
with the Gods. We suggest caution in dealing with beings with a set
of values so foreign from our own. They should be approached in the
same way one would approach a person from a country whose ways are
very very different.
In general, were also very reticent to make decisions about
classifying the various other peoples. It would be very easy to draw
lines and place certain spirits into little boxes which label their
function, but that seems overly mechanical and of little utility.
Elves and other wights are not human, and it might be too much to
try to classify them in other than subjective terms. Its probably
best to simply make your intent clear, experiment, and use the terms
which work for you.
Demi-Gods
There are a whole classification of Gods which are not truly part of
the Aesir, Vanir, or even the Jotnar. Wayland the Smith is the best
example of this that we can offer. Wayland, called Volund in the
Norse version, is the greatest of smiths, but its clear in the
mythology that he was more or less a human man. The myth tells of how
he lost his wife and was enslaved by a human King. While his powers
allow him to outwit and take vengeance on the king, its clear
throughout that hes not on the level of a Thor or an Odin. What one
does about these demi-Gods or local Gods is a good question. I see
nothing wrong with pouring a blot in their honor and dealing with them
as you would any other God or Goddess. On the other hand, they are
not part of the Aesir and I think it might be disrespectful to honor
them with the Aesir or as part of a ceremony dedicated to the Aesir as
they seem of a different nature.
Ancestor Worship:
Honoring ones ancestors was one of the most sacred duties of the
Norsemen. One of the most important parts of greeting new people was
the exchanging of personal lineages at sumbel. The worship of the
Disir is closely linked to ancestor worship. However, it is difficult
for modern day Pagans to seriously engage in ancestor worship. We
are, for the most part, without a strong connection to our heritage,
and even if we feel motivated we would probably need to skip at least
a thousand years back to find ancestors who would not have been
appalled by our Heathen beliefs. One substitution for ancestor
worship in the modern Asatru movement has been the veneration of heros
from the Sagas and legends of our people.
The manner of how we honor ancestors is also somewhat troubling. I
reserve the blot ritual to Gods and other powers, and Im not sure if
its appropriate to pour a blot to an ancestor, no matter how
important he was. I think the most important part of ancestor worship
is remembering, and the sumbel seems the most important part of that.
While we discuss ancestry, I must mention that some modern Asatru
groups, in part because of holdovers from 19th century cultural
movements, have placed a great deal of emphasis on ancestry in terms
of race and ethnic heritage. Many (although not nearly as many as
some hysterical commentators would have you believe) have held that
Asatru was a religion for whites or Northern Europeans only. In my
not particularly humble opinion, this is pure idiocy. The basic
argument for this is that people of other cultures do not share the
same background and values. This is certainly true, but the key word
in my opinion is culture,